Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 14: how MPs voted on 12 May 2025
Division 192, 12 May 2025, 21:14. Noes 402, against 98; majority 304 (Commons Votes API).
The question
New Clause 14
Borders legislation: Human Rights Act
“(1) This section applies to any provision made by or by virtue of this Act, the Illegal Migration Act 2023, the Immigration Acts, and any legislation relating to immigration, deportation, or asylum, including the Immigration Rules within the meaning of the Immigration Act 1971.
(2) The legislation identified in subsection (1), including in relation to the enforcement of immigration policy, deportation, the granting, removal, revocation or alteration of immigration status, or asylum, or other entitlements, must be read and given effect to disregarding the Human Rights Act 1998.
(3) In the Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993, omit section 2.
(4) In the Immigration Act 1971—
(a) in section 8AA—
(i) in subsection (2), omit “Subject to subsections (3) to (5)”; and
(ii) omit subsections (2)(a)(ii) and subsections (3) to (6);
(b) in section 8B, omit subsection (5A).
(5) In section 84 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002—
(a) in subsection (1), after “must” insert “not”;
(b) in subsection (2), after “must” insert “not”;
(c) in subsection (2), for “section 6” substitute “any section”; and
(d) in subsection (3) after “must” insert “not”.
(6) Where the European Court of Human Rights indicates an interim measure relating to the exercise of any function under the legislation identified in subsection (1)—
(a) it is only for a Minister of the Crown to decide whether the United Kingdom will comply with the interim measure under this section; and
(b) an immigration officer or court or tribunal must not have regard to the interim measure.”.—(Chris Philp.)
This new clause would disapply the Human Rights Act and interim measures of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to this Bill and to other legislation about borders, asylum and immigration.
Brought up.
Question put, That the clause be added to the Bill.
As printed in Hansard before the division.
By party
Conservative MPs cast 87 of the 98 named Aye votes; Labour MPs 316 of the 401 named No votes.
| Party | Aye (named) | No (named) |
|---|---|---|
| Labour | 0 | 316 |
| Conservative | 87 | 0 |
| Liberal Democrat | 2 | 61 |
| Independent | 0 | 9 |
| Scottish National Party | 0 | 7 |
| Reform UK | 5 | 0 |
| Green Party | 0 | 4 |
| Plaid Cymru | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic Unionist Party | 2 | 0 |
| Social Democratic & Labour Party | 0 | 1 |
| Traditional Unionist Voice | 1 | 0 |
| Ulster Unionist Party | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 401 |
Tellers: Katie Lam (Conservative, Weald of Kent) and Mr Richard Holden (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) (Ayes); Keir Mather (Labour, Selby) and Christian Wakeford (Labour, Bury South) (Noes).
How each MP voted
499 named · CSV
Sources
- Bill: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025
- Hansard: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
- Commons division 192
- Commons Votes API: division
dc07555420bde4a315 October 2026 - Hansard API: division search
b1ab8e1ec9335fbe15 October 2026 - Hansard API: debate
9f05e1404ea0a34415 October 2026
SHA-256 of each copy read. Open Parliament Licence v3.0