Make swift bricks compulsory in new housing to help red-listed birds
This petition gathered 109,896 signatures between 31 October 2022 and 30 April 2023, according to the Parliament petitions site. The Government responded on 1 December 2022. MPs debated it in Westminster Hall on 10 July 2023.
The petition
The petition's creator is not named in the Petitions site's published record. Quoted in full from the UK Parliament petitions site.
Make swift bricks compulsory in new housing to help red-listed birds
Swifts have declined by over 50% in the UK. Adult swifts, known for site-fidelity, return to the same nests. We want swift bricks to be required in all new housing, to provide homes for these birds. Surveys show these are used by red-listed swifts, house martins, starlings and house sparrows.
Swifts spend more time airborne than any other bird, sometimes only landing when returning to their nests in our walls, from Africa. They're tidy and quiet neighbours but modern building methods block swifts out.
The metric for calculating biodiversity net gain doesn't include existing nest sites in buildings, or swift bricks, but these bricks can be designed into buildings without conflicting with insulation, and should be made a requirement for new housing.
Iconic and irreplaceable, swifts define our summers. Please help them. The RSPB supports this petition.
The Government's response
The Government published its response on 1 December 2022. Its summary:
We welcome actions by developers to provide “swift bricks”, however Government considers this a matter for local authorities depending upon the specific circumstances of each site.
The response in full:
The Government welcomes any action by individual developers who wish to provide “swift bricks”, and the benefits are set out in our Planning Practice Guidance on the Natural Environment: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/natural-environment
We will not be legislating, however, to compel local authorities or developers to include particular forms of green infrastructure in every development. In some high density schemes the provision of “swift bricks”, for instance, might be inappropriate; in other places it could not achieve the desired connectivity for wildlife. For the natural environment to thrive we need both local authorities and developers to understand the natural characteristics of each site, and to take proportionate and reasonable action relevant to that location.
Planning conditions or obligations can, in appropriate circumstances, be used to require that a planning permission provides for works that will measurably increase biodiversity. Local authorities can prioritise specific species such as swifts, and we have seen these in Brighton and Hove Council. We are also introducing new Local Nature Recovery Strategies which are tools designed to help local authorities plan proactively for nature, to drive more coordinated, practical and focussed action to help nature, including priority species.
As with all our policies, this area continues to evolve and develop, balancing the very laudable different priorities of supporting people into home ownership with protecting and enhancing our natural environment – both of which we want to achieve. The Government will continue to review and bring forward proposals in this policy area and there will be opportunities in future for residents to contribute through consultation.
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Where the signatures came from
Signatures came from 650 constituencies on the boundaries used until the 2024 general election. The largest number, 616, came from Witney.
108,865 of the signatures were from the UK and 1,031 from elsewhere, by the location signers gave.
| Constituency | Signatures |
|---|---|
| Witney | 616 |
| Suffolk Coastal | 570 |
| Stroud | 527 |
| Sheffield, Hallam | 493 |
| West Dorset | 481 |
| Oxford West and Abingdon | 480 |
| Somerton and Frome | 466 |
| South Cambridgeshire | 465 |
| Central Devon | 459 |
| South East Cambridgeshire | 456 |
| Region | Signatures |
|---|---|
| South East | 20,434 |
| South West | 15,848 |
| East of England | 13,530 |
| North West | 9,183 |
| London | 8,974 |
| Yorkshire and The Humber | 8,425 |
| West Midlands | 7,878 |
| East Midlands | 7,769 |
| Scotland | 6,628 |
| Wales | 5,434 |
| North East | 3,241 |
| Northern Ireland | 964 |
Debate in Parliament
MPs debated the petition in Westminster Hall on 10 July 2023. Read the debate in Hansard. House of Commons Library debate pack.
Source and receipt
- https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/626737.jsonUK Parliament Petitions API · read 2026-10-15 · SHA-256
e138466486f2ca6e… - The petition on petition.parliament.uk
The petition's words are its creator's and the response is the Government's; this site quotes both and gives no view on either. Signature counts can still change while a petition is open. To report an error, send a correction request.