State IntegrityReceipts, not verdicts

Petitions to Parliament · 2019 to 2024 Parliament (archived)

Lower university tuition fees for students until online teaching ends

The Parliament petitions site records 171,137 signatures for this petition, which closed on 5 April 2021. The Government responded on 30 October 2020. MPs debated it in Westminster Hall on 16 November 2020.

Signatures
171,137
final count
Government response
30 October 2020
Department for Education
Debated
16 November 2020
Westminster Hall

The petition

The petition's creator is not named in the Petitions site's published record. Quoted in full from the UK Parliament petitions site.

Lower university tuition fees for students until online teaching ends

Students across the UK have returned to University to be told our learning will be predominantly online for the foreseeable future. The Government should therefore lower our tuition fees and we should receive a partial refund for the effects this will have on our learning and university experience.

Millions of students have been overlooked by the govt throughout this pandemic. Tuition fees remain at 9.2k a year plus interest which hasn’t been addressed. Thousands of 1st year students have been forced into isolation with no consideration to the effects this will have on mental health. Uni students have been told to trust the government through these unprecedented times but we’ve been constantly overlooked. I’m asking the government to lower tuition fees until learning goes back to normal.

The Government's response

The Government published its response on 30 October 2020; the petitions site lists the Department for Education as responsible. Its summary:

Universities are responsible for setting their own fees. Any lowering of fees would be their decision. Government is not considering a temporary change to fee limits, or a programme of refunds.

The opening 328 words of the 756-word response:

Government recognises this is a difficult period for students and supports their desire to continue receiving the best possible learning experience from their higher education providers (HEPs). Government also recognises the efforts being made by HEPs and their staff in continuing to deliver education and support during these unprecedented times.

HEPs are open and combining online and in-person teaching in COVID-secure environments to minimise risk. There are innovative examples of high-quality online and blended learning happening across the country, and developing and delivering this provision may be more expensive for HEPs than in-person teaching. Government has been clear that the quantity and quality of teaching, and accessibility for all students, must be maintained. If students are dissatisfied with their HEP, then they have rights under consumer law that they can rely on.

Government has been working with the Office for Students (OfS), which published a statement on 9 October outlining measures that it is taking to monitor digital teaching quality. This includes contacting HEPs that have moved predominantly to online provision due to local COVID-19 restrictions. The OfS is monitoring HEPs to ensure they maintain the quality of provision, make every effort to ensure online learning is accessible to all, and have been clear in their communications to students about how arrangements for teaching and learning may change. The OfS will investigate if it has concerns.

The institutional autonomy of HEPs means that they are responsible for setting their own fees, up to a maximum of £9,250 per year for a standard full-time undergraduate course for those on the Approved (fee cap) part of the OfS register. It is a condition of OfS registration that HEPs must deliver well-designed courses that provide a high-quality academic experience, and enable students’ achievement to be reliably assessed. In deciding whether to continue charging full fees during the pandemic, we expect HEPs to ensure that they are delivering courses that are fit for purpose and are helping students’ progress towards their qualifications.

Read the full response on the petitions site.

Where the signatures came from

Signatures came from 649 constituencies on the boundaries used until the 2024 general election. The largest number, 1,849, came from Liverpool, Riverside.

170,463 of the signatures were from the UK and 674 from elsewhere, by the location signers gave.

Ten constituencies with the most signatures (2010 Westminster constituencies (used until the 2024 general election)).
ConstituencySignatures
Liverpool, Riverside1,849
Brighton, Pavilion1,662
Nottingham South1,633
Bristol West1,579
Leeds Central1,457
Manchester Central1,401
Nottingham East1,345
Newcastle upon Tyne East1,315
Sheffield Central1,310
Holborn and St Pancras1,098
Signatures by region and nation, as published by the Petitions site.
RegionSignatures
London33,372
South East23,547
North West19,864
South West14,321
Yorkshire and The Humber14,120
East Midlands13,899
West Midlands13,539
East of England13,117
Wales6,850
North East6,333
Northern Ireland4,326
Scotland2,538

Debate in Parliament

MPs debated the petition in Westminster Hall on 16 November 2020. Read the debate in Hansard. House of Commons Library debate pack.

Source and receipt

The petition's words are its creator's and the response is the Government's; this site quotes both and gives no view on either. Signature counts can still change while a petition is open. To report an error, send a correction request.