Review the decision to use previous data to calculate exam grades
The Parliament petitions site records 148,885 signatures for this petition, which closed on 27 September 2020. The Government responded on 4 September 2020. MPs debated it in Westminster Hall on 12 October 2020.
The petition
The petition's creator is not named in the Petitions site's published record. Quoted in full from the UK Parliament petitions site.
Review the decision to use previous data to calculate exam grades
We want the Education Secretary and the Government to step in and review the exam board’s decision on how GCSE and A-Level grades will be calculated and awarded due to the current coronavirus crisis. We want a better solution than just using our previous data to be the basis of our grade.
Using previous data could result in unfair grading as the majority of this data may be inaccurate and unrepresentative of a student’s ability. Most of these assessments are not always taken seriously, and could misinterpret students true potential. Students’ GCSE exam results have often shown vast improvement compared to their previous data. We deserve an equal opportunity for improving and receiving fair grades. Although the option of doing our exams next academic year is available it is still highly inconvenient and sets back our future.
The Government's response
The Government published its response on 4 September 2020; the petitions site lists the Department for Education as responsible. Its summary:
Students in England have now received the higher of their centre assessment grade or calculated grade for GCSEs, AS and A levels in 2020.
The response in full:
Following an announcement on 17 August, the great majority of GCSE, A and AS level students have now received the centre assessment grades that their schools and colleges had submitted for them. In the minority of cases where the grades that the exam boards had previously calculated for students were higher than the centre assessment grade, students have received their calculated grade.
Ofqual had consulted on and implemented a standardisation process for exam results this summer, but the system resulted in too many inconsistent and unfair outcomes for A and AS level students. It became clear that the approach resulted in too many anomalies to be resolved through appeals and which severely undermined confidence in the system.
Subsequently, Ofqual decided to award centre assessment grades, which are the grades which schools and colleges assessed students were most likely to have achieved had exams gone ahead. The Government supported this decision, which was deemed to be the fairest approach to avoid some students receiving grades that did not reflect their prior performance.
We understand this situation has caused a great deal of stress and uncertainty and apologise for the distress this has caused young people and their parents.
Department for Education
Where the signatures came from
Signatures came from 650 constituencies on the boundaries used until the 2024 general election. The largest number, 797, came from Chipping Barnet.
147,635 of the signatures were from the UK and 1,250 from elsewhere, by the location signers gave.
| Constituency | Signatures |
|---|---|
| Chipping Barnet | 797 |
| Hornsey and Wood Green | 747 |
| Poplar and Limehouse | 691 |
| Bethnal Green and Bow | 665 |
| West Ham | 656 |
| East Ham | 643 |
| Finchley and Golders Green | 637 |
| Bristol West | 632 |
| Brighton, Pavilion | 625 |
| Islington North | 599 |
| Region | Signatures |
|---|---|
| London | 29,356 |
| South East | 22,495 |
| North West | 17,280 |
| East of England | 13,870 |
| West Midlands | 13,362 |
| South West | 13,075 |
| Yorkshire and The Humber | 12,691 |
| East Midlands | 9,636 |
| North East | 7,017 |
| Wales | 3,718 |
| Scotland | 1,337 |
| Northern Ireland | 904 |
Debate in Parliament
MPs debated the petition in Westminster Hall on 12 October 2020. Read the debate in Hansard.
Source and receipt
- https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/306773.jsonUK Parliament Petitions API · read 2026-10-15 · SHA-256
e3ee507724852570… - The petition on petition.parliament.uk
The petition's words are its creator's and the response is the Government's; this site quotes both and gives no view on either. Signature counts can still change while a petition is open. To report an error, send a correction request.