Darren Jones corrected the Commons record on Standards in Public Life

10 February 2026 · Commons Hansard, Written Corrections · Cabinet Office

Darren Jones made the correction and printed in Hansard's Written Corrections on 10 February 2026. The figure 1425 in the original became 1478 in the correction, higher by 53. Altogether 63 words differ between the two versions.

Original and corrected words

Struck through: original only. Bold: correction only.

Original	Corrected
On the Bill, as I informed the House last week, the Government’s preference is to bring forward legislation that could be applied to any peer who has breached the rules and brought the other place into disrepute. We have begun the work of looking at the scope and ability for such a Bill to be introduced. I have been informed that a Bill of that nature has not been brought before Parliament since ~~1425~~ —[Interruption.] No, the 1917 Bill was about a collective group of peers who had been, I think, collaborating with the ~~Nazis~~ around the ~~second~~ world war.	… I have been informed that a Bill of that nature has not been brought before Parliament since 1478 —[Interruption.] No, the 1917 Bill was about a collective group of peers who had been, I think, collaborating with the Germans around the first world war.

Original

Corrected

On the Bill, as I informed the House last week, the Government’s preference is to bring forward legislation that could be applied to any peer who has breached the rules and brought the other place into disrepute. We have begun the work of looking at the scope and ability for such a Bill to be introduced. I have been informed that a Bill of that nature has not been brought before Parliament since ~~1425~~ —[Interruption.] No, the 1917 Bill was about a collective group of peers who had been, I think, collaborating with the ~~Nazis~~ around the ~~second~~ world war.

… I have been informed that a Bill of that nature has not been brought before Parliament since 1478 —[Interruption.] No, the 1917 Bill was about a collective group of peers who had been, I think, collaborating with the Germans around the first world war.

The correction in Hansard.

Receipt

Read from	https://hansard-api.parliament.uk/debates/debate/A58924EF-28F6-4061-A790-8F3D45837DA6.json
Date read	15 October 2026
SHA-256	`c616e4d07a60d2137f596e0794c6b2188dd0d3faee22b6402db20242cddfd9fc`