Sarah Jones corrected a written answer on West Midlands Police: Maccabi Tel Aviv Football Club

13 January 2026 · Commons written answer · Home Office

Nick Timothy (Conservative, West Suffolk) asked written question 104120 on 7 January 2026. Sarah Jones answered on 13 January 2026 for the Home Office, and Sarah Jones corrected the answer on 13 January 2026. The corrected text no longer gives the figures 3.8, 9.7. Altogether 649 words differ between the two versions.

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the oral answer of 26 November 2025, Official Report, House of Lords, Column 1331, on West Midlands Police: Maccabi Tel Aviv Fans, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of giving directions under Section 40 of the Police Act 1996 to dismiss the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police.

Original and corrected answer

Struck through: original only. Bold: correction only.

Original	Corrected
~~Stop~~ and ~~search~~ is ~~a vital tool~~ for ~~tackling crime, but it must~~ be ~~exercised fairly and lawfully. Using ethnicity as a factor~~ in ~~deciding whether to stop and search someone, except where pursuing a specific description, is unlawful. Code A~~ of the Police and ~~Criminal Evidence~~ Act ~~1984, referencing~~ the ~~Equality Act 2010, prohibits stops based on physical appearance. Supervision of officers and their use of stop and search powers~~ rests with ~~chief constables.~~ The ~~Government supports~~ the ~~National Police Chiefs’ Council’s Police Race Action Plan, which promotes an anti-racist culture~~ and ~~commits chief constables to address disproportionality, ensuring decisions~~ are based on evidence, not ethnicity. On stop and search in particular, the plan commits that chief constables will identify and address disproportionality in the use of stop and search, particularly in relation to searches of children. Police performance is assessed by HMICFRS, which reviews stop and search as part of its inspection framework. Where misconduct is identified, the Independent Office for Police Conduct can impose sanctions, ensuring poor performance is addressed. Stop and search disproportionately impacts particular ethnic groups, disparity rates have fallen recently. Last year, Black people were 3.8 times more likely to be stopped and searched than White people, 9.7 times in 2018/19. Data is key to tackling disparities, and the Home Office continues to work with forces to improve the collection and accuracy of ethnicity data. I am also aware that stop and search has the potential to impact young people, their families and educational attainment. We continue to monitor research on police powers to inform policy development. Strip search is one of the most intrusive powers available to the police, and the Government is clear that such searches must only be conducted when absolutely necessary. While there will be circumstances in which such searches are required in order to protect people, prevent harm, or secure evidence, this must be done with full regard for the dignity and welfare of the individual involved, particularly where the individual is a child. As set out in the Government’s Manifesto, we are committed to introducing new legal safeguards around the strip search of children. We are working closely with policing stakeholders to deliver this commitment. The Government recognises the importance of transparency in ensuring that police powers, particularly those involving children, are properly used and subject to effective public scrutiny. Data on strip search is published by the Home Office on an annual basis. The latest data can be found here: Police custody and pre-charge bail, year ending March 2024 - GOV.UK Stop and search, arrests, and mental health detentions, March 2025 - GOV.UK We keep this under regular review.	The Home Office will make public the findings from His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services on the information and intelligence used by West Midlands Police to assess and categorise the Aston Villa v Maccabi Tel Aviv match on 6 November, and how accurately this reflected intelligence received from the Netherlands Police, as soon as this is provided. The Home Office does not hold any information on whether the Muslim Brotherhood or other organisations subject to government non-engagement shared information with West Midlands Police in relation to this match. Similarly, the Home Office does not hold any information on discussions between West Midlands Police and the Metropolitan Police, MI5, Cabinet Office, or the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre in relation to this match. A reply to the Honourable Member for West Suffolk’s letter of 2 January 2026 will be sent in due course. Section 40 of the Police Act 1996 enables the Home Secretary to direct a PCC or Mayor where a force is failing, in exceptional circumstances. The power for the Home Secretary to require a police authority to call on a Chief Constable to retire was removed through the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 and the power to dismiss Chief Constables now rests with Police and Crime Commissioners. The Home Secretary has already taken action and commissioned HMICFRS to review the information and intelligence used by West Midlands Police. The findings from this are due to be provided on 12 January.

Original

Corrected

~~Stop~~ and ~~search~~ is ~~a vital tool~~ for ~~tackling crime, but it must~~ be ~~exercised fairly and lawfully. Using ethnicity as a factor~~ in ~~deciding whether to stop and search someone, except where pursuing a specific description, is unlawful. Code A~~ of the Police and ~~Criminal Evidence~~ Act ~~1984, referencing~~ the ~~Equality Act 2010, prohibits stops based on physical appearance. Supervision of officers and their use of stop and search powers~~ rests with ~~chief constables.~~
The ~~Government supports~~ the ~~National Police Chiefs’ Council’s Police Race Action Plan, which promotes an anti-racist culture~~ and ~~commits chief constables to address disproportionality, ensuring decisions~~ are based on evidence, not ethnicity. On stop and search in particular, the plan commits that chief constables will identify and address disproportionality in the use of stop and search, particularly in relation to searches of children.
Police performance is assessed by HMICFRS, which reviews stop and search as part of its inspection framework. Where misconduct is identified, the Independent Office for Police Conduct can impose sanctions, ensuring poor performance is addressed.
Stop and search disproportionately impacts particular ethnic groups, disparity rates have fallen recently. Last year, Black people were 3.8 times more likely to be stopped and searched than White people, 9.7 times in 2018/19. Data is key to tackling disparities, and the Home Office continues to work with forces to improve the collection and accuracy of ethnicity data. I am also aware that stop and search has the potential to impact young people, their families and educational attainment. We continue to monitor research on police powers to inform policy development.
Strip search is one of the most intrusive powers available to the police, and the Government is clear that such searches must only be conducted when absolutely necessary. While there will be circumstances in which such searches are required in order to protect people, prevent harm, or secure evidence, this must be done with full regard for the dignity and welfare of the individual involved, particularly where the individual is a child.
As set out in the Government’s Manifesto, we are committed to introducing new legal safeguards around the strip search of children. We are working closely with policing stakeholders to deliver this commitment.
The Government recognises the importance of transparency in ensuring that police powers, particularly those involving children, are properly used and subject to effective public scrutiny. Data on strip search is published by the Home Office on an annual basis. The latest data can be found here:
Police custody and pre-charge bail, year ending March 2024 - GOV.UK
Stop and search, arrests, and mental health detentions, March 2025 - GOV.UK
We keep this under regular review.

The Home Office will make public the findings from His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services on the information and intelligence used by West Midlands Police to assess and categorise the Aston Villa v Maccabi Tel Aviv match on 6 November, and how accurately this reflected intelligence received from the Netherlands Police, as soon as this is provided.
The Home Office does not hold any information on whether the Muslim Brotherhood or other organisations subject to government non-engagement shared information with West Midlands Police in relation to this match.
Similarly, the Home Office does not hold any information on discussions between West Midlands Police and the Metropolitan Police, MI5, Cabinet Office, or the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre in relation to this match.
A reply to the Honourable Member for West Suffolk’s letter of 2 January 2026 will be sent in due course.
Section 40 of the Police Act 1996 enables the Home Secretary to direct a PCC or Mayor where a force is failing, in exceptional circumstances.
The power for the Home Secretary to require a police authority to call on a Chief Constable to retire was removed through the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 and the power to dismiss Chief Constables now rests with Police and Crime Commissioners.
The Home Secretary has already taken action and commissioned HMICFRS to review the information and intelligence used by West Midlands Police.
The findings from this are due to be provided on 12 January.

The question and answer on the Parliament website.

Receipt

Read from	https://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1869243?expandMember=true
Date read	15 October 2026
SHA-256	`75bf8e6dbe8601b0eba7e09302a7e616d9af040a42206b89457a9932781f12f5`