State IntegrityReceipts, not verdicts

Sir Nicholas Dakin corrected a written answer on Electronic Tagging: Standards

11 June 2025 · Commons written answer · Ministry of Justice

Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour, Clapham and Brixton Hill) asked written question 50556 on 7 May 2025. Sir Nicholas Dakin answered on 14 May 2025 for the Ministry of Justice, and Sir Nicholas Dakin corrected the answer on 11 June 2025. The corrected text no longer gives the figure 10,438. Altogether 55 words differ between the two versions.

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 1 May 2025 to Question 46823, on Electronic Tagging: Standards, what estimate she has made of the number of offenders who were not tagged because the Probation Service held an incorrect address for them in the last two years.

Original and corrected answer

Struck through: original only. Bold: correction only.

OriginalCorrected
The information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
However, of the 10,438 untagged cases audited by probation between 01/01/25 and 31/03/25, eight referred
to the tagging provider having visited the wrong address as a result of the provision of the wrong address by the sentencing Court or releasing prison. The incorrect addresses have been corrected on EMS systems.
The information requested could only be obtained at disproportionate cost due to data quality issues.

The question and answer on the Parliament website.

More on Sir Nicholas Dakin.

Receipt

Read fromhttps://questions-statements-api.parliament.uk/api/writtenquestions/questions/1800529?expandMember=true
Date read15 October 2026
SHA-2569500efbec3a812cdb2cedfcc304ff5dc81333a92c650ccba71b1223cc153da3f