Sir Julian Brazier corrected the Commons record on Reserve Recruitment
The correction was made by letter from Mr Brazier, and printed in Hansard's Written Corrections on 2 December 2014. The figure 1.8 in the original became £1.8 billion in the correction. Altogether 5 words differ between the two versions.
The question
25. However these figures are dressed up, the Ministry of Defence’s own figures show that the trained strength of the Army reserve has actually fallen over the last 18 months. Given that the Government have had to throw more money at the reforms, including added incentives to join up, will the Minister answer the one question that the Government have so far ducked: how much extra are these reforms costing, over and above original estimates?
Original and corrected words
Struck through: original only. Bold: correction only.
| Original | Corrected |
|---|---|
| Over the past six months, the trained strength of the volunteer reserves has increased by 400, and it is only in the last three months that most of the reforms we have introduced have bitten. The answer to my hon. Friend’s question is that we are confident that the figure that we originally | Over the past six months, the trained strength of the volunteer reserves has increased by 400, and it is only in the last three months that most of the reforms we have introduced have bitten. The answer to my hon. Friend’s question is that we are confident that the figure that we originally offered— £1.8 billion , over the 10-year period—will be adequate for the purpose. We are still aiming to reach our targets. Numbers are growing and recruiting is increasing rapidly. |
More on Sir Julian Brazier.
Receipt
| Read from | https://hansard-api.parliament.uk/debates/debate/14120265000002.json |
|---|---|
| Date read | 15 October 2026 |
| SHA-256 | bdf18816a1134239a94023a2b85ca683011a0054262736393854f8ef5d5ff3ec |