State IntegrityReceipts, not verdicts

Baroness Featherstone corrected the Commons record on Animal Experiments: Primates

18 November 2010 · Commons Hansard, Written Corrections

Baroness Featherstone made the correction and printed in Hansard's Written Corrections on 18 November 2010. The correction replaced 3 figures (1,257, 100, 958) with 2 figures (1139, 932). Altogether 13 words differ between the two versions.

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (a) how many and (b) what species of non-human primates imported for the purposes of scientific research were categorised as (i) captive-born (or F1 generation) and (ii) captive-bred (F2+ generation) in (A) 2009 and (B) 2010. Letter of correction from Lynne Featherstone: Errors have been identified in the response given to the hon. Member for Crawley (Henry Smith) on 4 November 2010. In the table referring to figures from 2009, the number ‘100’ should read ‘85’, the number ‘1,257’ should read ‘1,139’ and the number ‘958’ should read ‘932’. The answer was as follows:

Original and corrected words

Struck through: original only. Bold: correction only.

OriginalCorrected
Although the information currently submitted to the Home Office following the acquisition of each batch of non-human primates provides evidence that animals have been born in captivity, there is currently no requirement for the records to indicate whether animals are F1 or F2+. However, from the information available we estimate the respective totals to be as detailed in the following table.
Numbers of imported captive-born (or F1 generation) and captive-bred (F2+ generation) non-human primates
| F1
| F2
2009
| |
Common marmoset
| 0
| 100
Rhesus macaque
| 0
| 44
Cynomolgus macaque
| 1,257
| 958
| |
2010 (reported to date)
| |
Common marmoset
| 0
| 0
Rhesus macaque
| 0
| 40
Cynomolgus macaque
| 970
| 545
The answer should have been:
Although the information currently submitted to the Home Office following the acquisition of each batch of non-human primates provides evidence that animals have been born in captivity, there is currently no requirement for the records to indicate whether animals are Fl or F2+. However, from the information available we estimate the respective totals to be as detailed in the following table.
Numbers of imported captive-born (or F1 generation) and captive-bred (F2+ generation) non-human primates
| F1
| F2
2009
| |
Common marmoset
| 0
| 85
Rhesus macaque
| 0
| 44
Cynomolgus macaque
| 1,139
| 932
| |
2010 (reported to date)
| |
Common marmoset
| 0
| 0
Rhesus macaque
| 0
| 40
Cynomolgus macaque
| 970
| 545

The correction in Hansard.

More on Baroness Featherstone.

Receipt

Read fromhttps://hansard-api.parliament.uk/debates/debate/10111868000003.json
Date read15 October 2026
SHA-25640f97c0dd5d4637dd3eda56dfd011e86ee937b1c36c69ec7d266b59979f49039